ISSN: 2056-3736 (Online Version) | 2056-3728 (Print Version)

Productivity Growth Recovery Mechanisms: An ARDL Approach Lessons from the United States, Japan and South Korea

Michael Koczyrkewycz, Taha Chaiechi and Rabiul Beg

Correspondence: Michael Koczyrkewycz, michael.koczyrkewycz@my.jcu.edu.au

College of Business, Law, and Governance, James Cook University, Australia

pdf (593.41 Kb) | doi: https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/8211

Abstract

Productivity growth is an essential ingredient for achieving long-term economic growth and sustainable development. In the absence of such growth, economic growth is not achievable. Accordingly, this paper examines economic resilience through multiple productivity channels within the United States, Japan and South Korea. Adopting a Kaleckian post-Keynesian approach, productivity growth is constructed as a function of investment, capacity utilisation, indicators of financial development, and an indicator of fiscal policy. Utilising annual historical data from 1980-2019, this paper adopts Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) models, Vector Autoregressive-based Impulse Response Functions (IRF) and Variance Decompositions (VD) to examine the resilience of productivity growth through the speeds of adjustment after an external shock. Results show that long and short-run unidirectional causality between productivity growth and the explanatory variables exists amongst all economies through the error-correction terms (ECT) and ARDL models. When imposing a simulated one-time S.D. shock upon the explanatory variables, differing speeds of adjustment and recovery processes in the long-run are present. As such, the strength of causal relationships amongst productivity growth and the explanatory variables ultimately affects speeds of adjustment and hence recovery.

Keywords:

  Economic Resilience, Productivity Growth, Kaleckian post-Keynesian, Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL), Impulse Response Functions (IRF), Variance Decomposition (VD).


References

APEC. (2021). What is Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation? Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC.

Bhaduri, A., & Marglin, S. (1990). Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375-393.

Bolt, J., Inklaar, I., Jong, H., & Luiten, J. (2018). Rebasing 'Maddison': New Income Comparisons and the Shape of Long-Run Economic Development. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. Groningen Growth and Development Centre.

Briguglio, L., Cording, G., Garrugia, N., & Vella, S. (2005). Conceptualising and Measuring Economic Resilience: Pacific Islands Regional Integration and Governance. Canberra: A.N.U. Press.

Carey, K. (1996). The relationship between inventory investment and total factor productivity growth: Cost shocks or demand shocks? . Economics Letters, 51, 219-223.

Chaiechi, T. (2012). Financial development shocks and contemporaneous feedback effect on key macroeconomic indications: A Post Keynesian time series analysis. Economic Modelling, 29, 487-501.

Chaiechi, T., & Nguyen, N. (2021). Measuring urban economic resilience of two tropical cities, using impulse response analysis. Bulletin of Applied Economics, 8(1), 59-79.

Chu, T., Holscher, J., McCarthy, D. (2020). The impact of productive and non-productive government expenditure on economic growth: an empirical analysis in high-income versus low to middle income economies. Empirical Economics. 58, 2403-2430.

Demmou, L., Stefanescu, I., Arquie, A. (2019). Productivity growth and finance: The role of intangible assets - sector level analysis. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No: 1547.

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.

Duasa, J. (2007). Determinants of Malaysian Trade Balance: An ARDL Bound Testing Approach. Global Economic Review, 36(1), 89-102.

Duernecker, G., Herrendorf, B., & Valentinyi, A. (2020). The Productivity Growth Slowdown and Kaldor's Growth Facts. Arizona State University.

Dutt, A. (1992). Rentiers in post-Keynesian models. In Recent Developments in Post-Keynesian Economics. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

Dutt, A. (1995). Internal finance and monopoly power in capitalist economists: A reformulation of Steindl's growth model. Metroeconomica, 46, 16-34.

El-Wassal, K. (2005). Understanding the growth in emerging stock markets. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 4(3), 227-261.

Goldsmith, R. (1969). Financial Structure and Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hansson, P., & Henrekson, M. (1994). A new framework for testing the effect of government spending on growth and productivity. Public Choice, 81, 381-401.  

Hendry, D. (1993). Econometrics: Alchemy or Science? Essays in Econometric Methodology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Kaldor, N. (1957). A Model of economic growth. Economic Journal, (67), 591-624.

Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In: The Theory of Capital: Macmillan.

Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge.

Kalecki, M. (1968). Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Liebscher, K., Christl, J., Mooslechner, P., & Ritzberger-Grunwald, D. (2006). Financial Development, Integration and Stability: Evidence from Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe: Edward Elgar.

Malthus, R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. History of Economic Thought Books. McMaster University archive for the History of Economic Thought, number malthus1798.

McKinnon, R. (1973). Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution.

Moss, E., Nunn, R., & Shambaugh, J. (2020). The Slowdown in Productivity Growth and Policies That Can Restore It. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Productivity_Framing_LO_6.16_FINAL.pdf

Muto, I., Sudo, N., & Yoneyama, S. (2016). Productivity Slowdown in Japan's Lost Decades: How Much of It Can Be Attributed to Damaged Balance Sheets? No. 16-E-3. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series.

Myrdal, G. (1960). Beyond the Welfare State. New Haven. Yale University Press.

Nakamura, K., Kaihatsu, S., & Yagi, T. (2018). Productivity Improvement and Economic Growth. No.18-E-10. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series.

Narayan, P. (2004). Reformulating Critical Values for the Bounds F-statistics Approach to Cointegration: An Application to the Tourism Demand Model for Fiji. discussion papers. Monash University. Victoria: Department of Economics.

Narayan, P., & Narayan, S. (2006). Savings behaviour in Fiji: An empirical assessment using the ARDL approach to cointegration. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(7), 468-480.

Narayan, P., & Smyth, R. (2005). Trade Liberalization and Economic Growth in Fiji. An Empirical Assessment Using the ARDL Approach. Asia Pacific Economy, 10(1), 96-115.

Pai, K. (2016). The Technical Progress and Resilience in Productivity Growth of Korea's Growth-Leading Industries. Asian Economic Papers, 15(2), 167-191.

Pan, L., & Mishra, V. (2018). Stock market development and economic growth: Empirical evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 68, 661-673.

Parjiono, T. (2009). Economic Growth in Indonesia, The Driving forces of the level and the growth rate of real per capita income: An Econometric time series approach. (School of Business), James Cook University.

Pesaran. H, & Pesaran, B. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford.

Pesaran, H., & Shin, S. (1995). Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. D.A.E. Working Paper Series, 9514(Cambridge: Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge).

Pesaran, H., & Shin, S. (1999). Autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis, in: S. Storm (Ed.). Chapter (11). Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pesaran, M., Shin, S., & Smith, R. (1996). Testing the Existence of a Long-run Relationship. D.A.E. Working Paper Series, 9622 (Cambridge: Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge).

Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 289-326.

Phillips, P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.

Productivity Commission. (2009). Annual Report 2009-2010. Productivity Commission Annual Report Series. Australian Government Productivity Commission.

Ricardo, D. (1817). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray Publishing.

Shahbaz, M. (2012). Does trade openness affect long run growth? Cointegration, causality and forecast error variance decomposition tests for Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 29, 2325-2339

Shaw, E. (1973). Financial Deepening in Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sims, C. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.

Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.

Solow, R., Swan, T. (1956) Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. Economic Record, (32), 334-361.

Stockhammer, E., & Onaran, O. (2004). Accumulation, distribution and employment: a structural V.A.R. approach to a Kaleckian macro-model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15(4), 421-247.

The Conference Board. (2019). The Conference Board Productivity Brief 2019. Retrieved from:https://www.conferenceboard.org/retrievefile.cfm?filename=TED_ProductivityBrief_20191.pdf&type=subsite

Verdoorn, P. (1949). Factors that determine the growth of labour productivity in: McCombie, J., Pugno, M., Soro, B. (eds). Productivity Growth and Economic Performance. Essays on Verdoorn's Law, (2002). Basingsroke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wronski, M. (2019). The productivity growth slowdown in advanced economies: causes and policy recommendations, 55(4), 391-406.